18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Nokian
Line SUV
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
4
1
3
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#2
Average position
4.2
12.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2017
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
33
111
64
34

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison