18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Nokian
Line SUV
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
5
15
Best position
#2
#2
Average position
4.2
9.0
Latest test
2017
2025
Available sizes
33
225

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Dry braking
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Fuel efficiency
Nokian Line SUV
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Interior noise
Nokian Line SUV
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison