18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Test Profile

Nokian
Line SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Number of tests
5
10
36
Best position
#2
#2
#1
Average position
4.2
6.0
3.1
Latest test
2017
2026
2023
Available sizes
33
104
296

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Wet braking
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Wet handling
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Dry braking
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Dry handling
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Fuel efficiency
Nokian Line SUV
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Mileage
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Interior noise
Nokian Line SUV
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison