18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Nokian Line SUV

Nokian

Line SUV

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Nokian

Line SUV

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

5

10

Best position

#2

#2

Average position

4.2

6.0

Latest test

2017

2026

Available sizes

33

104

Wet

Wet

Nokian Line SUV

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line SUV

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line SUV

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet braking

Nokian Line SUV

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line SUV

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

Nokian Line SUV

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dry

Dry

Nokian Line SUV

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry braking

Nokian Line SUV

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Dry handling

Nokian Line SUV

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Costs

Costs

Nokian Line SUV

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line SUV

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Mileage

Nokian Line SUV

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Comfort

Comfort

Nokian Line SUV

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line SUV

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison