18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Nokian Line SUVUpper-middle
NokianNokian

Line SUV

R15 – R19
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Nokian
Line SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
18
4
3
3
1
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
Average position
4.2
6.1
12.0
3.3
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2017
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
33
47
111
40
34
64

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison