18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Nokian
Line SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
6
26
Best position
#2
#3
#1
Average position
4.2
4.7
2.2
Latest test
2017
2026
2026
Available sizes
33
146
66

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison