18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Nokian Line SUV

Nokian

Line SUV

VS

Firestone Roadhawk 2

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Firestone Roadhawk 2 also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Nokian

Line SUV

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

5

6

Best position

#2

#3

Average position

4.2

4.7

Latest test

2017

2026

Available sizes

33

146

Wet

Wet

Nokian Line SUV

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line SUV

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Wet handling

Nokian Line SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line SUV

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet braking

Nokian Line SUV

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Dry

Dry

Nokian Line SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry handling

Nokian Line SUV

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Dry braking

Nokian Line SUV

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Costs

Costs

Nokian Line SUV

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line SUV

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Comfort

Comfort

Nokian Line SUV

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line SUV

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison