18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Firestone Roadhawk also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Nokian
Line SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk
Number of tests
5
21
Best position
#2
#2
Average position
4.2
11.9
Latest test
2017
2024
Available sizes
33
164

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Wet braking
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Wet handling
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Dry braking
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Dry handling
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Mileage
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Fuel efficiency
Nokian Line SUV
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Interior noise
Nokian Line SUV
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison