18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
Line SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
3
6
1
Best position
#2
#2
#3
#1
Average position
4.2
3.7
4.7
1.0
Latest test
2017
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
33
34
146
64

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison