18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line SUV and Bridgestone Turanza T001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Line SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Firmenauto 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Line SUV and the Turanza T001 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 has B rating.

Test Profile

Nokian
Line SUV
Bridgestone
Turanza T001
Number of tests
5
12
Best position
#2
#2
Average position
4.2
6.8
Latest test
2017
2017
Available sizes
33
111

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
83%
Wet braking
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
94%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
78%
Wet handling
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
72%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
89%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
86%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
67%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
FirmenautoFirmenauto
Summer
2016215/60 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison