Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line SUV

R15 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Cinturato (C3)

9.4

R16 – R20

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Line SUV

Advantage

Cinturato (C3)

Number of tests

5

14

4

Best position

#2

#8

#1

Average position

4.2

13.4

3.3

Latest test

2017

2026

Available sizes

33

153

—

Wet

Nokian Line SUV

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet handling

Nokian Line SUV

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line SUV

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line SUV

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet braking

Nokian Line SUV

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Dry

Nokian Line SUV

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry handling

Nokian Line SUV

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry braking

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Costs

Nokian Line SUV

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Mileage

Nokian Line SUV

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Comfort

Nokian Line SUV

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line SUV

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Line SUV

Advantage

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison