18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Nokian Line SUV

Nokian

Line SUV

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Nokian

Line SUV

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

5

14

3

Best position

#2

#8

#2

Average position

4.2

13.4

3.3

Latest test

2017

2026

2026

Available sizes

33

153

60

Wet

Wet

Nokian Line SUV

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line SUV

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line SUV

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Nokian Line SUV

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Wet handling

Nokian Line SUV

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Dry

Dry

Nokian Line SUV

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry handling

Nokian Line SUV

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dry braking

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

Costs

Nokian Line SUV

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

Nokian Line SUV

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Comfort

Comfort

Nokian Line SUV

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line SUV

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison