18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Nokian Line SUV

Nokian

Line SUV

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Nokian

Line SUV

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

14

3

Best position

#2

#8

#2

Average position

4.2

13.4

3.7

Latest test

2017

2026

2025

Available sizes

33

153

34

Wet

Wet

Nokian Line SUV

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line SUV

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Nokian Line SUV

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Nokian Line SUV

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line SUV

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dry

Dry

Nokian Line SUV

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Nokian Line SUV

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Costs

Nokian Line SUV

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Nokian Line SUV

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Comfort

Nokian Line SUV

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line SUV

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison