18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Nokian
Line SUV
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
14
26
Best position
#2
#8
#1
Average position
4.2
13.4
2.2
Latest test
2017
2026
2026
Available sizes
33
153
66

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Nokian Line SUV
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line SUV
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Nokian Line SUV
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line SUV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line SUV
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Nokian Line SUV
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Nokian Line SUV
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line SUV
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Nokian Line SUV
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line SUV
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Interior noise
Nokian Line SUV
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison