18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Nokian
Line SUV
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
5
14
Best position
#2
#8
Average position
4.2
13.4
Latest test
2017
2026
Available sizes
33
153

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line SUV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Nokian Line SUV
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line SUV
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet handling
Nokian Line SUV
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line SUV
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian Line SUV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Dry braking
Nokian Line SUV
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Nokian Line SUV
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line SUV
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line SUV
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Mileage
Nokian Line SUV
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison