18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian Hakka Blue 3 vs. Viking WinTech vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test Profile

Nokian
Hakka Blue 3
Viking
WinTech
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of tests
1
6
23
Best position
#2
#11
#1
Average position
2.0
20.8
6.7
Latest test
2024
2024
2025
Available sizes
28
59
107

Wet

Wet
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
93%
Viking WinTech
55%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Wet handling
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
80%
Viking WinTech
52%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
100%
Viking WinTech
46%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
100%
Viking WinTech
52%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Wet braking
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
100%
Viking WinTech
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
80%
Viking WinTech
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
70%
Viking WinTech
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dry handling
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
60%
Viking WinTech
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Dry braking
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
80%
Viking WinTech
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
90%
Viking WinTech
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Exterior noise
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
80%
Viking WinTech
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Comfort
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
100%
Viking WinTech
50%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
60%
Viking WinTech
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison