Comparison: Nexen N Fera Primus vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Looking at the two tyres Nexen N Fera Primus and BFGoodrich Advantage, from manufacturers Nexen and BFGoodrich respectively, based on various test results, we can notice some key differences between these two models.

Focusing on the Nexen N Fera Primus, this tyre has a rating of 71%. It delivered stand-out performance in the aspects of Aquaplaning - longitudal, securing the 10th position in the Autobild test comprising 51 tyres overall. The tyre exhibited good braking capabilities, dynamic wet handling and very good aquaplaning qualities especially with its performance in wet conditions. However, delayed steering response and limited mileage were pointed as areas of improvement.

On the other hand, the BFGoodrich Advantage, which has a lower rating of 68%, has been praised for its comfort, bagging the 20th position in the same Autobild test. This tyre showed a strong performance in dry handling, noise level, and rolling resistance, in addition to an affordable pricing. Areas of evaluation in this tyre include tendency to understeer in wet conditions and extended braking times. Moreover, compared to the Nexen N Fera Primus, it didn't perform as well in respective test positions.

In conclusion, the Nexen N Fera Primus edges out the BFGoodrich Advantage overall, particularly in wet conditions, despite both being rated as summer tyres. Though the BFGoodrich Advantage provides a comfortable ride with dynamic dry handling and lesser noise, its performance in wet conditions is an area requiring improvement.

As neither tyre has been replaced by a newer model, customers can make their decisions based on these existing models, and this comparison. It's crucial to take into account these strengths and weaknesses when deciding between the Nexen N Fera Primus and the BFGoodrich Advantage.