Comparison: Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Michelin

Primacy 5

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Primacy 5

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

3

10

4

3

1

Best position

#1

#2

#3

#2

#1

Average position

4.7

6.0

12.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

126

104

111

34

64

Wet

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Dry

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Costs

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Primacy 5

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison