18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Michelin Primacy 4Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4

R14 – R23
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Vredestein ULTRAC Premium
VredesteinVredestein

ULTRAC

1.6
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato P7 C2 Turanza T005

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Number of tests
20
10
—
36
Best position
#1
#2
—
#1
Average position
3.5
6.0
—
3.1
Latest test
2022
2026
—
2023
Available sizes
384
104
—
296

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
93%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 4
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Wet side guide
Michelin Primacy 4
68%
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Wet performance
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 4
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Dry driving behavior
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Dry steering response
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Dry lane changing
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Dry performance
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%

Offroad

Offroad
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Grass traction
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Gravel traction
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Vredestein ULTRAC
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
65%
Sand traction
Michelin Primacy 4
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
86%
Handling on gravel
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Vredestein ULTRAC
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Interior noise
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
56%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Fuel efficiency
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
29%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Price/value
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Vredestein ULTRAC
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison