18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 4
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
20
1
36
5
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
3.5
1.0
3.1
2.2
Latest test
2022
2025
2023
2025
Available sizes
384
64
296
63

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 4
73%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet side guide
Michelin Primacy 4
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Wet performance
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 4
91%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry driving behavior
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Dry lane changing
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Dry steering response
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Dry performance
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%

Offroad

Offroad
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Grass traction
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Gravel traction
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling on gravel
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%
Mud traction
Michelin Primacy 4
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%
Sand traction
Michelin Primacy 4
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Interior noise
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Fuel efficiency
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison