18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Debica Presto HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In the tyre industry, both Michelin Primacy 4 and Debica Presto HP2 are well-regarded. This comparison is aimed at shedding light on the strengths and weaknesses of both models based on numerous twin tests, thereby aiding in the selection process.


Starting off with the Michelin Primacy 4, it's a summer touring tyre that is manufactured in Spain, Germany, and Poland. It excels in the performance tests and is our favourite with an impressive 77% rating. A key point to note is that the Michelin Primacy 4 has now been replaced with a newer tyre model. Michelin, a renowned tyre manufacturer, is esteemed for production of high-quality tyres and this model is no exception.


Turning to the Debica Presto HP2, it's another summer tyre model that earned a striking 70% in our rating. This tyre provided excellent value for money, as observed in the Autobild tyre test. Much like the Michelin Primacy 4, the Debica Presto HP2 has also been substituted with a novel tyre model. The manufacturer, Debica, has a solid reputation for creating reliable tyres.


Test performance comparison is a key factor when selecting tyres. In a test involving 53 tyres by Autobild, the Michelin Primacy 4 secured a remarkable fifth position, demonstrating its superior quality. The Debica Presto HP2 showed decent performance as well, attaining the sixteenth position mainly due to its value for money. In the ADAC tyre test that involved 18 tyres, the Michelin Primacy 4 held a proud second position, whereas the Debica Presto HP2 positioned seventh.


All in all, both tyres are well-respected in the industry. The Michelin Primacy 4 stands out for its excellent test performances, while the Debica Presto HP2 is noted for its great value-for-money proposition. These relative strengths and weaknesses should be considered alongside individual driving habits, weather conditions, and budget when choosing a tyre. However, the Michelin Primacy 4 and Debica Presto HP2 have now been replaced with newer models, which may provide further enhancements and could be worth considering.

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 4
Debica
Presto HP2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
20
5
10
Best position
#1
#4
#2
Average position
3.5
12.8
6.0
Latest test
2022
2024
2026
Available sizes
384
16
104

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
Debica Presto HP2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Debica Presto HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 4
73%
Debica Presto HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet side guide
Michelin Primacy 4
68%
Debica Presto HP2
63%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Debica Presto HP2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 4
91%
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Debica Presto HP2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry driving behavior
Michelin Primacy 4
83%

Offroad

Offroad
Michelin Primacy 4
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Debica Presto HP2
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Interior noise
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Debica Presto HP2
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Fuel efficiency
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
Debica Presto HP2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Price/value
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Debica Presto HP2
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison