18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 4+
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
13
15
1
3
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
4.3
9.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
123
225
64
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison