18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

In the world of tyres, the Michelin Primacy 4+ and the Kumho Ecsta HS52 both hold their own, particularly within the touring, summer tyre category. However, upon examining test data thoroughly, some differences between these two models become readily evident.


The Michelin Primacy 4+ has lived up to the expectations set by its previous models, the Michelin Primacy 4 and Michelin Primacy 3, boasting a strong rating of 77%. The Primacy 4+ stands out for its impressive exterior noise control and admirable performance on dry surfaces. ADAC tests underline this tyre’s exceptional wet grip, high aquaplaning resistance, and low noise levels. There were, however, a few minor drawbacks noted such as slightly sluggish dry handling.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, slightly surpasses the Primacy 4+ in rating with a score of 78%. According to Autobild, its strong points include dry and wet braking and handling. Despite its excellent performance in the different testing conditions, it was reported to have a slightly less satisfying rolling comfort while bringing remarkable mileage and wet circle cornering capabilities to the table, as highlighted by ADAC.

All comparisons considered, both tyres have shown considerable strength in mutual tests. The Michelin Primacy 4+ landed at position 7 in Vibilagare's test, whereas the Kumho Ecsta HS52 reached position 3. Similarly, in Autobild's vast test involving 55 tyres, Kumho Ecsta HS52 outperformed the Michelin Primacy 4+ coming in 2nd compared to Michelin's 5th place.


In conclusion, while the Michelin Primacy 4+ is commended for its exemplary noise control and overall balanced performance, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 offers an appealing package with its excellent dry and wet handling, good mileage and its slightly higher rating. However, personal preference, driving conditions and usage may determine which of these two quality tyres is the better fit for individual motorists.

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 4+
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
13
10
23
13
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#2
#2
Average position
4.3
6.0
6.6
6.2
3.3
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
123
104
194
225
40

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
68%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet side guide
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
65%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry lane changing
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
88%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry steering response
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
66%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Interior noise
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
64%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
55%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
54%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison