18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

In the world of tyres, the Michelin Primacy 4+ and the Kumho Ecsta HS52 both hold their own, particularly within the touring, summer tyre category. However, upon examining test data thoroughly, some differences between these two models become readily evident.


The Michelin Primacy 4+ has lived up to the expectations set by its previous models, the Michelin Primacy 4 and Michelin Primacy 3, boasting a strong rating of 77%. The Primacy 4+ stands out for its impressive exterior noise control and admirable performance on dry surfaces. ADAC tests underline this tyre’s exceptional wet grip, high aquaplaning resistance, and low noise levels. There were, however, a few minor drawbacks noted such as slightly sluggish dry handling.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, slightly surpasses the Primacy 4+ in rating with a score of 78%. According to Autobild, its strong points include dry and wet braking and handling. Despite its excellent performance in the different testing conditions, it was reported to have a slightly less satisfying rolling comfort while bringing remarkable mileage and wet circle cornering capabilities to the table, as highlighted by ADAC.

All comparisons considered, both tyres have shown considerable strength in mutual tests. The Michelin Primacy 4+ landed at position 7 in Vibilagare's test, whereas the Kumho Ecsta HS52 reached position 3. Similarly, in Autobild's vast test involving 55 tyres, Kumho Ecsta HS52 outperformed the Michelin Primacy 4+ coming in 2nd compared to Michelin's 5th place.


In conclusion, while the Michelin Primacy 4+ is commended for its exemplary noise control and overall balanced performance, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 offers an appealing package with its excellent dry and wet handling, good mileage and its slightly higher rating. However, personal preference, driving conditions and usage may determine which of these two quality tyres is the better fit for individual motorists.

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 4+
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
13
10
33
Best position
#1
#2
#1
Average position
4.3
6.0
4.1
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
123
104
658

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Wet Braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
53%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Wet Handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
96%
Wet Circle Cornering
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
100%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Aquaplaning Cross
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
52%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
71%
Dry Performance
Michelin Primacy 4+
94%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Turanza T005
92%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Dry Braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
95%
Dry Handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
86%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Comfort & Noise
Michelin Primacy 4+
98%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Kumho Ecsta HS52
94%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Noise Exterior
Michelin Primacy 4+
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
94%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Economy
Michelin Primacy 4+
69%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Turanza T005
100%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Rolling Resistance
Michelin Primacy 4+
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
100%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison