18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
13
1
18
6
3
5
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
4.3
1.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
123
64
47
146
40
63

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison