Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

Primacy 4+

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

13

3

1

16

3

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#3

#2

Average position

4.3

3.3

1.0

5.5

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

2023

2026

2025

Available sizes

123

40

64

153

40

34

Wet

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry lane changing

Michelin Primacy 4+

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Interior noise

Michelin Primacy 4+

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Costs

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison