Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Premium

Michelin

Primacy 4+

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance+

Number of tests

13

3

17

23

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

4.3

3.3

1.7

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

123

40

80

176

Wet

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet braking

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Wet handling

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Dry

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dry braking

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dry handling

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Dry lane changing

Michelin Primacy 4+

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Dry steering response

Michelin Primacy 4+

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Comfort

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Comfort

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

80%

Exterior noise

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Interior noise

Michelin Primacy 4+

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

98%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Costs

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Mileage

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Price/value

Michelin Primacy 4+

51%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison