18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 3 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 3
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
10
14
10
Best position
#1
#8
#2
Average position
6.1
13.4
6.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
182
153
104

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 3
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 3
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 3
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 3
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Primacy 3
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 3
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 3
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison