18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (59%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 has a better rating of 95% compared to 74% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Michelin Pilot Sport 5 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Michelin
Pilot Sport 5
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
14
10
Best position
#1
#2
Average position
3.4
6.0
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
70
104

Wet

Wet
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Price/value
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Mileage
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison