18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
7
1
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
2.4
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
137
64
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
88%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
94%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Offroad

Offroad
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
80%
Grass traction
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
85%
Gravel traction
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%
Handling on gravel
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
77%
Sand traction
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
63%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
71%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
64%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
66%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison