Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Premium

Michelin

Pilot Sport 4 S

VS

Ventus Evo

Ecsta PS71

8.3

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Pilot Sport 4 S

Ventus Evo

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

10

3

15

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

2.1

3.3

9.0

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

193

60

225

Wet

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet braking

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Dry

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry braking

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

96%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Costs

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Pilot Sport 4 S

Ventus Evo

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison