18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
10
1
15
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
2.1
1.0
9.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
195
64
225

Wet

Wet
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison