Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

Pilot Sport 4 S

VS

ION Evo

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Pilot Sport 4 S

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

1

3

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

2.1

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

195

64

34

Wet

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

87%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

85%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dry

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

95%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

96%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 S

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison