Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Michelin

Pilot Sport 4 S

VS

e.Ziex

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Pilot Sport 4 S

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

10

3

1

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

2.1

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

195

34

64

Wet

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

84%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

87%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

85%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Dry

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

95%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

96%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison