18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
10
3
2
Best position
#1
#2
#1
Average position
2.1
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
195
34
23

Wet

Wet
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
96%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Dry braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry lane changing
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Dry steering response
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison