18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Triangle EffeXWinter TW421 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Triangle
EffeXWinter TW421
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
4
1
14
Best position
#5
#7
#1
Average position
10.3
7.0
3.6
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
188

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Triangle EffeXWinter TW421
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Triangle EffeXWinter TW421
25%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Triangle EffeXWinter TW421
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Triangle EffeXWinter TW421
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Triangle EffeXWinter TW421
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Triangle EffeXWinter TW421
44%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Triangle EffeXWinter TW421
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Triangle EffeXWinter TW421
18%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Triangle EffeXWinter TW421
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Triangle EffeXWinter TW421
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Triangle EffeXWinter TW421
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison