Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Budget

Semperit

Speed-Life 3

Ecsta PS71

8.3

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

Speed-Life 3

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

4

14

15

Best position

#5

#2

Average position

10.3

18.1

9.0

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

116

225

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Price/value

Michelin Energy Saver +

55%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Energy Saver +

Speed-Life 3

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison