Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Budget

Semperit

Speed-Life 3

Ventus Evo

9.8

R17 – R22

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

Speed-Life 3

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

4

14

3

Best position

#5

#2

Average position

10.3

18.1

3.3

Latest test

2018

2026

Available sizes

—

116

60

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Energy Saver +

Speed-Life 3

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison