18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Pirelli
P Zero Winter
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
4
1
24
2
Best position
#5
#9
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
9.0
2.7
1.5
Latest test
2018
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
85
302
65

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
55%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Dunlop Winter
63%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Dunlop Winter
81%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
58%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Dunlop Winter
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison