18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Pirelli
P Zero Winter
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
4
1
49
Best position
#5
#9
#1
Average position
10.3
9.0
3.2
Latest test
2018
2024
2024
Available sizes
85
213

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
58%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison