18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
2
24
3
Best position
#5
#1
#1
#2
Average position
10.3
2.0
2.7
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
48
302
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison