18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
3
3
3
Best position
#5
#1
#2
#2
Average position
10.3
4.7
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
126
40
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison