18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
4
13
1
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
4.3
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
—
123
64

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison