18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
4
4
15
Best position
#5
#3
#2
Average position
10.3
12.0
9.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
—
111
225

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison