Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Number of tests

4

1

Best position

#5

#3

#1

Average position

10.3

12.0

1.0

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

—

111

64

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo

Energy Saver +

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison