18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
4
3
26
Best position
#5
#3
#2
#1
Average position
10.3
12.0
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
111
34
66

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison