18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Number of tests
4
24
1
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
2.7
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
151
27

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison