18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Number of tests
4
24
3
Best position
#5
#1
#5
Average position
10.3
2.7
7.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
151
1

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison