Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Roadhawk 2

8.0

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

Ecsta PS71

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

4

15

6

Best position

#5

#2

#3

Average position

10.3

9.0

4.7

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

—

225

146

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Price/value

Michelin Energy Saver +

55%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Energy Saver +

Ecsta PS71

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison