18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Michelin Energy Saver +

Michelin

Energy Saver +

VS

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Michelin Energy Saver + was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested.

Test Profile

Michelin

Energy Saver +

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

4

15

Best position

#5

#2

Average position

10.3

9.0

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

—

225

Wet

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Costs

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Price/value

Michelin Energy Saver +

55%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Dry

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Comfort

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison